Landlord |
Since all acetate compounds are soluble in water (one of the wonderful advantages of using acetate compounds, of course), they're really handy for working with metals which give mostly insoluble compounds, like lead, Pb. |
In class, we mixed Pb(C2H3O2)2, which all lazy chemists abbreviate as Pb(OAc)2, lead(II) acetate, with potassium chromate, K2CrO4, both of which are soluble (ionic) solutions to produce the insoluble lead chromate, PbCrO4, known disparagingly as "landlord yellow". (It makes the world's cheapest colored paint. Fortunately, it's no longer in use since no one wants lead on their walls! It's toxic, as are almost all heavy metals.) | |
To do so, we had to satisfy the following reaction: Pb(OAc)2 + K2CrO4 PbCrO4 + K(OAc) Pb(OAc)2 + K2CrO4 PbCrO4 + 2 K(OAc) | |
Stoichiometric |
So just as we used mole-to-mole conversion ratios to analyze the relative weights of atoms in molecules, we can do exactly the same thing to obtain the relative weights of reactant and/or products in balanced chemical reactions! |
Suppose we needed to know how much potassium acetate we'd be stuck
with as a by-product to the desired "landlord's yellow" when we reacted
100 kg of lead(II) acetate with sufficient potassium chromate to
use up all the lead compound? We'd set up the same (Even the same molecular pairs may appear in different reactions with different stoichiometric coefficients, so these molar ratios aren't fixed for given pairs...they're fixed for given balanced reactions.) | |
For the reaction equation above, then, we'd solve the problem posed
as follows: To convert between mass and moles, we'll need the molecular weights of both lead(II) acetate (0.3252 kg) and potassium acetate (0.0981 kg): 1 mol Pb(OAc)2 2 mol KOAc .0981 kg KOAc 100 kg Pb(OAc)2 ----------------- -------------- ------------- .3252 kg Pb(OAc)2 1 mol Pb(OAc)2 1 mol KOAcwhich is 60.3 kg of KOAc, smaller than 100 kg, of course, because potassium (39.1 g/mol) weighs far less than lead (207.2 g/mol). | |
Balancing |
As we've emphasized twice already, none of this is worth navel lint unless the reaction equations are balanced; so we have to do valid chemical algebra. Let's see how to go about it using another example from the lecture, the combustion (more like explosion) of the anaesthetic known as "ether", actually diethylether or nowadays, ethoxyethane, (C2H5)2O. |
That's close to the structural formula:
H H H H | | | | H--C--C--O--C--C--H a highly volatile, flammable liquid! | | | | H H H Hbut problem 3.89(e) just calls it C4H10O. Here goes: | |
C4H10O(l) + O2(g) CO2(g) + H2O(l) | |
fix carbon |
C4H10O(l) + O2(g) 4 CO2(g) + H2O(l) |
fix hydrogen |
C4H10O(l) + O2(g) 4 CO2(g) + 5 H2O(l) |
fix oxygen |
C4H10O(l) + 6 O2(g) 4 CO2(g) + 5 H2O(l) |
Limiting |
When we spoke earlier of reacting lead(II) acetate with an excess
of potassium chromate, we wanted to make sure that all of the lead
reacted; we didn't want to run out of chromate before all the
lead was gone. In other words, we wanted the lead(II) acetate to be
the limiting reactant not the potassium chromate.
Toward that end, it would be no trick to calculate the minimum amount of the chromate for any given amount of lead by comparing moles to moles as we've done before. However, we should also be able to tell which reactant among a mixture of them is there in the shortest supply, because it, the limiting reactant, will determine how much product the reaction produces! Reactants in relative abundance will have excesses (waste!) left over. It's clear that in commercial production, you really want not to have unnecessary waste...after all you paid for what you're not using! |
So let's look at a reaction with several reactants present in given amounts and find some simple method of picking the one that will run out first and thus will govern the efficiency of the whole process. | |
KCl + MnO2 + H2SO4 K2SO4 + MnSO4 + Cl2(g) + H2O Cl appears in only one molecule on each side; so we try to balance it first: | |
fix chlorine |
2 KCl + MnO2 + H2SO4 2 K2SO4 + MnSO4 + Cl2(g) + H2O |
fix sulfate |
2 KCl + MnO2 + 2 H2SO4 K2SO4 + MnSO4 + Cl2(g) + H2O |
fix non-sulfate oxygen |
2 KCl + MnO2 + 2 H2SO4 K2SO4 + MnSO4 + Cl2(g) + 2 H2O |
Find the Limiting Reactant |
Suppose we're given a reaction mixture with 40 g KCl, 25 gm MnO2,
and 50 g of sulfuric acid. Which species is limiting the reaction? One way (suggested by the text) is to methodically assume that each reactant in turn is the limiting reactant and calculate some product amount (say Cl2) based upon that one pretending the rest of the reactants are there in abundance. Clearly, the one that produces the least Cl2 is the winner (or loser, depending upon how you think about it), e.g., the reaction quits when it is used up and that smallest Cl2 product is all you're going to see. |
A faster way involves comparing what you have with what you want,
given the reaction stoichiometry. Calculate how many grams of each
reactant would be perfect to make the reaction run as written. In this
case, that would require 2 mol of KCl (2×74.55 g/mol = 149.1 g),
one of MnO2 (86.9 g), and 2 of sulfuric acid
(2×98.1 g/mol = 196.2 g). | |
Needed Available |
149.1 86.9 196.2 grams 2 KCl + MnO2 + 2 H2SO4 K2SO4 + MnSO4 + Cl2(g) + 2 H2O 40 25 50 gramsAll we have to do is divide Available grams by Needed grams to tell how far (in a fractional sense) the available grams of each reactant will allow the reaction to go! Had we supplied what was "needed," each of those ratios would've been 1.0 which would have meant "all the way, baby!" (There's no reason not to find ratios greater than one. No problem; means more moles are supplied than the stoichiometric coefficients called for.) As it is, the ratios are
|